Five years of CAASPP results show slow improvements in student achievement

11 Oct
0
students with pencils

On Oct. 9, the California Department of Education released the results of the 2018–19 Smarter Balanced English language arts/literacy and mathematics assessments. Given that these scores represent the fifth year of implementation, it is a good opportunity to reflect on the trends in California and opportunities and areas for schools, districts and county offices of education to focus on in the future.

Review statewide, county, district and school CAASPP scores

Outcomes for all students trending up but still not acceptable

While scores for all grades have been trending up over the past five years, there is still a lot of work to do to improve student outcomes. As seen in figures 1 and 2, nearly half or more students across each grade did not meet grade level standards in ELA or mathematics.

The good news is that there has been a positive upward trend every year. The challenge for every school, district and county office of education is in investing in strategies to speed up the pace of improvement. There are also examples of schools and districts that have seen considerable growth, meaning that there are pockets of innovation and opportunity from which school and district leaders can learn.

Achievement gaps persist

Opportunity gaps continue to lead to persistent achievement gaps that have either remained stagnant or only slightly narrowed over the past five years. These gaps show that far too many of California’s 6.2 million public school students are not being provided with the supports they need to meet their potential. Moreover, these gaps disproportionately impact students based on ethnicity, economic status, language status and disability status, among other characteristics.

In fact, tackling these achievement gaps is central to producing acceptable statewide outcomes for all students. To put this in perspective, one can focus on two groups that make up a majority of students in California:

1. Latinos make up 54 percent of California students, yet only 41 percent met or exceeded grade-level standards in ELA, compared to 65 percent of white students (a 25 percentage-point achievement gap). These gaps persist in math and are even wider when comparing African American and Native American students to their white peers.

2. Economically disadvantaged students make up 60 percent of California students, yet only 47 percent met or exceeded grade-level standards in ELA, compared to 71 percent of their wealthier peers (a 31 percentage-point achievement gap). These outcomes are similar in math.

While it is important to note that slight improvements for most student groups have been evident from year to year, the state must start to identify its Latino, African-American, Native American, economically disadvantaged, English learner, students with disabilities and other students that have not been historically served as well by the system as “high-potential students.” These underserved students deserve added attention by state, county, district and school leaders in order to invest in their potential and begin to see improved outcomes in the coming years.

Student growth is still not measured in California, but that may change

In reflecting on the Common Core State Standards after the first five years of implementation, it is critical to also remember that scores from each year represent a snapshot of student performance. Therefore, they are useful at evaluating how a district is serving students in any given year, but not at evaluating growth in student performance from one year to the next. However, the State Board of Education has been evaluating options for a growth model, with the possibility of including it in the California School Dashboard as early as November 2020. This would bring California in line with the rest of the nation (except for Kansas), which currently calculate and report student outcomes with a growth model.

The need for Full and Fair Funding

The final thought to consider with the five years of CAASPP scores is that Full and Fair Funding will greatly help in supporting district improvement efforts. Yes, California public schools must do better at preparing students for college, career and life success, and at closing opportunity gaps. But at the same time, demands on public schools have increased over the past two decades, including new standards and mandates, the need to upgrade facilities, the demands of a global economy and increasing need for student social-emotional supports, to name a few. Unfortunately, increasing demands have not come with the necessary financial support from federal and state leaders.

It is for this reason that although it is important to recognize the challenge that these scores highlight, leaders, educators, parents and community members must also continue to push for Full and Fair Funding for California schools so that it moves from one of the lowest 10 states in per-student funding to one of the top 10 over the next decade.

To learn more about CSBA’s Full and Fair Funding campaign, visit www.fullandfairfunding.org.

Comments are closed.